Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Courts are more apt to find the link between the unreasonable search and the seizure of evidence is weak when they are dealing with testimony rather than physical evidence.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to arrest Jack, who is suspected of murdering his wife. Time is of the essence as Agent Smith just learned that Jack is scheduled to fly out of the country tomorrow morning to return to his home in South America. Uncertain that he has sufficient time to secure and execute a search warrant before Jack leaves the United States, Agent Smith contacts Sgt. Cane in the city where Jack currently resides and asks Sgt. Cane to go and search Jack's house to find evidence to support the murder charge. Assume Sgt. Cane proceeded to search Jack's home without a warrant. Applying the Court's holding in Wolf v. Colorado, which of the following statements is true about any evidence obtained by Sgt. Cane?


A) The evidence would be admissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife since no unreasonable search was conducted by a federal officer.
B) The evidence would be inadmissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife because federal agents participated in the unreasonable search by engaging the local police in their arrest efforts.
C) The evidence would be inadmissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife as the product of an unreasonable search by a state law enforcement officer.
D) The evidence would be admissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife because Jack could later sue the state agents for violation of his Fourth Amendment right to privacy.

E) None of the above
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court took the following stance regarding the Exclusionary Rule and state courts:


A) The Fourth Amendment right to privacy, through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, is enforceable against the states by using the same sanction of exclusion that is used against the federal government.
B) The exclusionary rule is "part and parcel" and is "an essential part "of the Fourth Amendment.
C) The exclusionary rule is a safeguard because of its deterrent effect rather than a personal constitutional right of privacy.
D) Both a and b are correct.
E) All of the above are correct.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The silver platter doctrine allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence seized illegally by federal agents at trial.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The good faith exception to the exclusionary rule focuses primarily on the reasonable beliefs of police officers.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Compare and contrast the independent source exception to the inevitable discovery exception.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Student responses should include a discu...

View Answer

In Wolf v. Colorado, the U.S. Supreme was called on to address whether evidence seized in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments could be used in state court and held that:


A) The exclusionary rule that applied to defendants in federal court also applied to defendants in state court.
B) The exclusionary rule was an explicit requirement of the Fourth Amendment and equally applicable to the state and federal courts.
C) The exclusionary rule was a judiciary creation to expedite the trial process.
D) State courts were not required to exclude from trial evidence that was seized in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

E) C) and D)
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Brown v. Illinois (1975) , the U.S. Supreme Court articulated three circumstances where there is the attenuation of the taint of an unlawful search. Which of the following is not one of the circumstances articulated by the court?


A) when there is a significant passage of time between the initial illegality and the discovery of the evidence
B) Where a Number of factors intervene to weaken the connection
C) When the police mistakenly or unintentionally misinterpret the law
D) All of the above

E) None of the above
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

___________ is a method created by the Court to limit the impact of the exclusionary rule. 3 and


A) Standing
B) Exceptions to the application of the exclusionary rule
C) The silver platter doctrine
D) Both a and b

E) B) and D)
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The difference between the independent source exception and the inevitable discovery exception is:


A) Under the independent source exception, the evidence introduced at trial was obtained legally whereas the evidence introduced at trial under the inevitable discovery exception was not.
B) The independent source exception relies on a factual finding before the evidence is admitted whereas the inevitable discovery exception necessarily implicates a hypothetical finding before the evidence is admitted.
C) The independent source exception requires third party information whereas the inevitable discovery exception relies on the idea that the police would have established probable cause for a warrant had they had more time to do so.
D) Both a and b are both correct.

E) None of the above
F) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

___________ is evidence that is obtained as a result of an unreasonable search.


A) Direct evidence
B) Derivative evidence
C) Relevant evidence
D) Admissible evidence

E) B) and C)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following statements is true about the silver platter doctrine?


A) The silver platter doctrine was the process whereby evidence was "served" by state law enforcement officers to federal prosecutors on a "silver platter."
B) The silver platter doctrine was used by federal agent to circumvent the exclusionary rule.
C) The silver platter doctrine was ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1960 in Elkins v. United States.
D) Only a and b are true.
E) All of the above statements are true.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

One of the key arguments in support of the exclusionary rule is that the exclusionary rule deters the police, thus serving to prevent future violations, not repair past violations.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What two categories of evidence might be obtained during an illegal search that could be deemed inadmissible in court under the exclusionary rule?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Student responses should inclu...

View Answer

In ________________ the U.S. Supreme Court, held that the requirements of the Fourth Amendment were incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore unreasonable searches and seizures by state officials were prohibited.


A) Wolf v. Colorado
B) Weeks v. United States
C) Elkins v. United States
D) Terry v. Ohio

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

One of the arguments against the exclusionary rule is that it undermines the purpose of the criminal trial.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the last 3 decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has relied on the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule to uphold the constitutionality of searches in five circumstances. These include all of the following, except:


A) Reliance on a warrant
B) Reliance on assurance by a judge that the warrant meets the Fourth Amendment standards
C) Reliance on the apparent authority of a third party to consent
D) Reliance on a statute that had been declared unconstitutional before the warrant was issue

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A police officer conducted an unlawful search of Fred's vehicle. When the police office momentarily stepped away from the vehicle, Fred sped away. With the police officer in pursuit, Fred opens the window in the vehicle and voluntarily throws narcotics out the vehicle's window. The drugs are subsequently seized by the police in Fred's arrest for possession of narcotics. Fred files a motion to suppress the narcotics. Applying the attenuation exception, how would the court rule on Fred's motion?


A) The court would deny Fred's motion.
B) The court would grant Fred's motion.
C) The court would defer a decision on Fred's motion pending the outcome of the trial.
D) The court would dismiss Fred's motion for lacking standing.

E) A) and C)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The first step taken when challenging the reasonableness of a search is:


A) Resist arrest
B) File a pretrial motion challenging the search
C) Flee the court's jurisdiction until a judicial determination is made on the constitutionality of the evidence
D) File a civil suit to recover the illegally seized evidence

E) None of the above
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Defendant Dan timely filed a motion to suppress evidence at his trial for kidnapping. The trial judge ruled against Dan and allowed the evidence to be admitted into Dan's trial. Dan was ultimately convicted of kidnapping. Dan appeals his conviction based on the admission of the evidence that was the subject of his motion to suppress. What is a possible outcome of Dan's case at the appellate level?


A) If the appellate court sides with Dan, the result is an automatic reversal of the guilty verdict.
B) If the appellate court sides with Dan, the result will be the reversal of the guilty verdict unless the appellate court finds that the trial judge's decision amounted to harmless error.
C) If the prosecution can successfully argue beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no reasonable probability that the evidence at issue influenced the outcome of the trial, Dan's conviction will be affirmed by the appellate court.
D) Both b and c are correct.

E) B) and C)
F) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 62

Related Exams

Show Answer