Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The evidence would be admissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife since no unreasonable search was conducted by a federal officer.
B) The evidence would be inadmissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife because federal agents participated in the unreasonable search by engaging the local police in their arrest efforts.
C) The evidence would be inadmissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife as the product of an unreasonable search by a state law enforcement officer.
D) The evidence would be admissible in a federal trial against Jack for the murder of his wife because Jack could later sue the state agents for violation of his Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Fourth Amendment right to privacy, through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, is enforceable against the states by using the same sanction of exclusion that is used against the federal government.
B) The exclusionary rule is "part and parcel" and is "an essential part "of the Fourth Amendment.
C) The exclusionary rule is a safeguard because of its deterrent effect rather than a personal constitutional right of privacy.
D) Both a and b are correct.
E) All of the above are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The exclusionary rule that applied to defendants in federal court also applied to defendants in state court.
B) The exclusionary rule was an explicit requirement of the Fourth Amendment and equally applicable to the state and federal courts.
C) The exclusionary rule was a judiciary creation to expedite the trial process.
D) State courts were not required to exclude from trial evidence that was seized in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) when there is a significant passage of time between the initial illegality and the discovery of the evidence
B) Where a Number of factors intervene to weaken the connection
C) When the police mistakenly or unintentionally misinterpret the law
D) All of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Standing
B) Exceptions to the application of the exclusionary rule
C) The silver platter doctrine
D) Both a and b
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Under the independent source exception, the evidence introduced at trial was obtained legally whereas the evidence introduced at trial under the inevitable discovery exception was not.
B) The independent source exception relies on a factual finding before the evidence is admitted whereas the inevitable discovery exception necessarily implicates a hypothetical finding before the evidence is admitted.
C) The independent source exception requires third party information whereas the inevitable discovery exception relies on the idea that the police would have established probable cause for a warrant had they had more time to do so.
D) Both a and b are both correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Direct evidence
B) Derivative evidence
C) Relevant evidence
D) Admissible evidence
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The silver platter doctrine was the process whereby evidence was "served" by state law enforcement officers to federal prosecutors on a "silver platter."
B) The silver platter doctrine was used by federal agent to circumvent the exclusionary rule.
C) The silver platter doctrine was ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1960 in Elkins v. United States.
D) Only a and b are true.
E) All of the above statements are true.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Wolf v. Colorado
B) Weeks v. United States
C) Elkins v. United States
D) Terry v. Ohio
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Reliance on a warrant
B) Reliance on assurance by a judge that the warrant meets the Fourth Amendment standards
C) Reliance on the apparent authority of a third party to consent
D) Reliance on a statute that had been declared unconstitutional before the warrant was issue
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court would deny Fred's motion.
B) The court would grant Fred's motion.
C) The court would defer a decision on Fred's motion pending the outcome of the trial.
D) The court would dismiss Fred's motion for lacking standing.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Resist arrest
B) File a pretrial motion challenging the search
C) Flee the court's jurisdiction until a judicial determination is made on the constitutionality of the evidence
D) File a civil suit to recover the illegally seized evidence
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If the appellate court sides with Dan, the result is an automatic reversal of the guilty verdict.
B) If the appellate court sides with Dan, the result will be the reversal of the guilty verdict unless the appellate court finds that the trial judge's decision amounted to harmless error.
C) If the prosecution can successfully argue beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no reasonable probability that the evidence at issue influenced the outcome of the trial, Dan's conviction will be affirmed by the appellate court.
D) Both b and c are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 62
Related Exams