Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Does not regulate redlining.
B) Is inapplicable to loan qualifications.
C) Is inapplicable to appraisers.
D) Applies to residential sellers, buyers, and brokers.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An easement for a pipeline is a taking that is proper and can be done with compensation.
B) Eminent domain is for taking title to land, not for easements.
C) Governments can take property for use, but cannot require landowners to have their property used for a pipeline.
D) An easement is not a taking and does not require eminent domain proceedings.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Racial discrimination.
B) The lack of low-income housing in Caucasian areas.
C) Who decides where the low-income housing units will be built.
D) Disparate impact.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Has now been clarified.
B) Is understood by courts and landowners.
C) There were three dissenting opinions and one justice's view that the court needs to start over.
D) Any regulation of land is a taking.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Public purpose
B) Judicial review
C) Just compensation
D) Landowner approval
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Are anti-redlining statutes.
B) Apply only to single-family dwelling loans.
C) Are the Fair Housing Act.
D) Have been declared unconstitutional.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Channel Builders has not engaged in discrimination because so many minorities buy his homes because the purpose of the tax credits is to provide housing for those with low incomes.
B) Channel Builders has violated the Fair Housing Act under a disparate impact theory.
C) Channel Builders cannot violate the Fair Housing Act unless an intentional act of discrimination is found.
D) The low-income housing tax credit program is on hold for location determinations.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Are unconstitutional.
B) Are still valid in some states.
C) Are invalid unless they existed before 1964.
D) Are easily discovered.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Is probably valid.
B) Probably violates the Voting Rights Act.
C) Is not subject to any restrictions other than following proper procedures for annexation hearings.
D) Is a form of redlining.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A narrow interpretation is given to the term
B) There must be a public road, park, school or other facility involved
C) Private property cannot be affected
D) State legislatures have limited the definition of public purpose
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 114
Related Exams