A) "Void" is the same as "unenforceable."
B) If a contract is held to be void,it is a contract,but for some reason,one party can end it.
C) If a contract is held to be illegal,the plaintiff will get some help,because the court will try to put the parties back to their original position.
D) If a contract is unenforceable,it means it doesn't exist.
E) If a contract is held to be void,it never was a contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If Reston can show the written contract,Outovit has no argument and will be bound to honour the contract.
B) Outovit need only prove that he didn't understand the nature and quality of his act to void the contract.
C) Outovit won't be bound by the contract because there hadn't yet been the payment for,or delivery of,the car.
D) If it is established that Reston didn't know Outovit was incapacitated at the time of contract and that the deal was fair,Outovit will be bound by the contract even if he didn't understand the nature and quality of his act.
E) To get out of a contract on the basis of insanity you have to be institutionalized.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A contract to purchase a new stereo
B) A contract for a camera
C) A contract for baseball tickets
D) A contract for rent
E) A contract for professional hairstyling
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Mentally disabled
B) Women
C) Children
D) Status Indians
E) Trade unions
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An adult cannot enforce any contract against an infant while the infant is still under age unless the contract is made binding by another statute (e.g.,government student loans) .
B) An infant is bound by his contract for necessaries and beneficial contracts of service.
C) An infant is not bound to repay his government student loan.
D) A contract with an infant is "absolutely void" except those contracts for necessaries and beneficial contracts of service.
E) If the adult did not know he was dealing with an infant,the adult is not bound by the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An intention to be legally bound is a necessary element of a contract; without it there is no contract.
B) Since family matters are private matters,an agreement between a husband and wife to transfer property from the husband to the wife could not be a contract even if all the other elements of a contract were present.
C) The court will presume there is no intent to be legally bound in social situations.
D) Although the court makes presumptions about the intention of parties to be bound,the presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary.
E) Parties may expressly state their intention to be legally bound,in which case the court need not rely on presumptions.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A contract in which one of the parties was an infant at the time the agreement was formed
B) An oral agreement for the sale of land
C) A written promise to guarantee the debt of another person
D) An oral agreement for a lease of land for two years
E) A promise by one person to pay another to defame a third
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The $100,000 was not enough,so was not fair.
B) At the time of the contract,unknown to Mr.Buyer,Mr.Seller did not understand the quality and nature of this act because of mental incapacity.
C) Although there was a letter from Mr.Seller referring to its essential terms,the contract itself was not in writing.
D) Although both parties agreed to this,there had not actually been any money paid on the contract,not even a deposit or a down payment.
E) The parties clearly stated that they did not want the agreement to be legally binding.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A contract that is illegal at the time it is formed
B) A contract that is illegal in the way in which it is performed
C) A contract that has been breached by one of the parties
D) A contract that lacks consensus,consideration,capacity,and intention
E) A contract that results in civil litigation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If Joe can show that there was no indication that Sam was drunk,even though Sam was completely incapacitated,he will be required to go through with the deal.
B) Sam just has to show he was legally intoxicated,and he will not be bound.
C) As long as Joe can produce the agreement in writing,there is nothing Sam can do to get out of the deal.Once Sam has signed the document,he is responsible for its contents.
D) Sam will not have to go through with the deal because no money has yet changed hands.
E) Being drunk is no excuse and the contract is binding.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Showing 21 - 40 of 162
Related Exams